Synthetic Faces, Real Disrepute: Deepfake and the Quest to Safeguard Celebrity Rights and Reputation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64322/JLRP.2025.2210Keywords:
Deepfake, Celebrity, Reputation, Identity, TechnologyAbstract
Deepfake, the technology which once belonged to the science fiction, has now emerged as a legal dilemma, threatening identity and reputation of the individuals, by stealing unique characteristics like face, voice etc, with just a click. This synthetic performance created by neural networks has redefined the boundaries of digital manipulation, as they generate digital imitation by using real footage or existing performance of a person. Deepfakes can be used for various innocuous purposes such as for creating parodies, create more engaging content, convert the content into multiple languages and generate such content that is easily accessible to the differently abled (Pavis, 2021). But the latest and most common use of the technology has got reduced to various malicious purposes such as stealing someone's identity and spreading misinformation. Amidst these systematic realities, one of the most concerning legal infringements is the violation of Right to Reputation, which is an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution, which was also reaffirmed in the case of Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India (2016) 7 SCC 221. This aspect becomes more alarming when it is narrowed down to the context of celebrities owing to their heightened public visibility, economic value attached to their persona and their abundant digital presence. For instance, the global cricketing legend Sachin Tendulkar in 2024 fell prey to the use of this technology as a video of him promoting an online gaming app went viral. To worsen the situation, in that deepfake video he suggested that his daughter Sara Tendulkar, also a popular social media figure, had earned Rs. 1.8 lakh per day making predictions on that gaming app. Considering his large fanbase, not only was he subjected to cyber bullying due to promotion of such illegal app, hampering his reputation, but also due to such identity fraud, his audience was at a high risk too of believing him and registering on such suspicious application. Such identity fraud does not only violate technology laws, but it also infringes personality rights by unauthorized use of personal attributes like name, voice etc.
This paper scrutinizes the vicious insinuation of deepfakes on the reputation of celebrities and also examines how various other rights such as right to sexual privacy, publicity and personality are hampered. It also aims to align the concept of individual identity evolving from John Locke’s Theory of Identity and other relevant theories, amidst contemporary technological advancements. Lastly, it also comes up with certain recommendations to combat the existing challenges and balance celebrity rights against malicious usage of deepfake models, while preserving and upholding the constitutional values and morality.
Downloads
References
1. Pavis, M. (2021). Rebalancing our regulatory response to Deepfakes with performers’ rights. Convergence, 27(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211033418.
2. Pandit, S., & Singh, J. (2024). The East & West of Deepfakes: A Comparative Study of Laws in India & UK. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.10000/IJLSI.112058.
3. Singh Pawar, Dr. K., & Deb Roy, N. (2021). Rising Menace of Deepfakes with The Help of AI: Legal Implications in India. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law, 4(3).
4. Kiran Bedi v. Committee of Inquiry, AIR 1988 SC 2252.
5. K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) v. Union of India, AIR 2017 SC 4161.
6. Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India, 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6914.
7. Pathak, H., Bhardwaj, D. (2025). Personality Rights in India: Legislation - A Need of the Hour? The CUSB Journal of Law and Governance (Vol. 1).
8. Anand, A. (2025). Digital Doppelgängers: Reinforcing Personality Rights to Fight Deepfakes in India. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 6(6).
9. Hoffman, R. B. (1981). The Right of Publicity - Heirs’ Right, Advertisers’ Windfall, or Courts’ Nightmare? DePaul Law Review, 31(1). https://via.library.depaul.edu/law-review/vol31/iss1/2.
10. Ahmad, T., & Swain, S. R. (2011). Celebrity Rights: Protection under IP Laws. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights (Vol. 16).
11. Sharma, P., & Tripathi, D. (2019). Celebrities’ Agony: Locating the Publicity Rights in the Existing IPR Framework. ILI Law Review. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3430422.
12. Krishna Kishore Singh v. Sarla A. Saraogi, 2021 SCC OnLine Del 3146.
13. Mishra, P. (2020). Indian Perspective of Publicity Rights of Celebrities in Modern Times. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, 2. https://www.ijlsi.com/wp-content/uploads/Indian-Perspective-of-Publicity-Rights-of-Celebrities-in-Modern-Times.pdf .
14. Das, S. (2024). Right to Reputation in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Navigating the Challenges of Synthetic Media. International Journal of Legal Science and Innovation, 6. https://doi.org/10.10000/IJLSI.111877.
15. Mullick, S., & Narnaulia, S. (2008). Protecting Celebrity Rights Through Intellectual Property Conceptions. NUJS Law Review, 1.
16. Subramanian Swamy v. Union of India, (2016) 7 SCC 221.
17. Umesh Kumar v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 2014 SC 1106.
18. Shivaji Rao Gaikwad v. Varsha Productions, 2015 SCC OnLine Mad 158.
19. ICC Development (International) Ltd. v. Arvee Enterprises, 2003 SCC OnLine Del 2.
20. Phoolan Devi v. Shekhar Kapoor, 1994 SCC OnLine Del 722.
21. Titan Industries v. Ramkumar Jewellers, 2012 SCC OnLine Del 2382.
22. R. Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu, (1994) 6 SCC 632.
23. Selvi J. Jayalalithaa v. Penguin Books India, 2012 SCC OnLine Mad 3263.
24. Krishnan Luthra, Adv. S., & Bakhru, V. (2019). Publicity Rights and the Right to Privacy in India. National Law School of India Review, 31(1). https://repository.nls.ac.in/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1259&context=nlsir .
25. Pascale, E. (2023). Deeply Dehumanizing, Degrading, and Violating: Deepfake Pornography and The Path to Legal Recourse. Syracuse Law Review, 73.
26. Citron, D. (2019). Sexual Privacy. Yale Law Journal, 128.
27. Chapman, E. (2024). Unveiling the Threat- AI and Deepfakes’ Impact on Women. In Dr. E. Johnson-Young (Ed.), Seminar in Digital Rhetoric Department of Communications and Digital Studies, University of Mary Washington.
28. Twomey, J., Foley, S., Robinson, S., Quayle, M., Aylett D E, M. P., Linehan, C., & Murphy, G. (2025). “What do you expect? You’re part of the internet”: Analyzing Celebrities’ Experiences as Usees of Deepfake Technology Experiences of deepfake abuse imagery and recourses. Cornell University. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.13065.
29. Choudhary, S. (2023). Unmasking the Truth: The Rise of Deepfakes and Its Implication on Society. Jus Corpus Law Journal, 4(1). https://www.juscorpus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/10.-Samiya-Choudhary.pdf.
30. Hussain Al-Khazraji, S., Hadi Saleh, H., Ibrahim Khalid, A., & Adnan Mishkhal, I. (2023). Impact of Deepfake Technology on Social Media: Detection, Misinformation and Societal Implications. The Eurasia Proceedings of Science, Technology, Engineering & Mathematics, 23. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/3456697.
31. Sebastian, M. (2023, November 7). Rashmika Mandanna calls for action against “scary” deepfake video. BBC. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-67305557.



